Posts Tagged ‘global warming’

Mark your calendars for the week of January 21, 2012!

In just one month—approximately two years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission opened the floodgates to unprecedented corporate influence over our democracy—the growing grassroots movement to take back the Constitution for We the People is going to make its presence very much known on the national stage. 

Like MSNBC host Dylan Ratigan, we’re “Mad as Hell” that corporations have shamelessly gotten the courts to grant them the rights of natural persons when it can buy them outsized influence and drown out the rest of our voices…while insisting they’re quite different from the rest of us when it suits their interests, like when they’re being sued for human rights violations.

Demonstrators at the U.S. Capitol on the one-year anniversary of the Citizens United ruling. Mark your calendars for bigger and stronger actions nationwide surrounding the two-year anniversary next month!

And we’re far from alone. In a recent Pew poll, 77 percent of Americans agree that too much power is in the hands of the wealthiest among us and large corporations.   As former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert Reich aptly puts it, the defining issue of this populist moment is not the size of government, but who exactly it stands for.

That’s where this Citizens United anniversary comes in as a “movement moment.”  Citizens will be taking a variety of different approaches to mark this troubling anniversary, but they’ll be unified in rallying their communities behind the need for a constitutional amendment to rein in corporate influence over the political process.

Continue Reading

Flickr ElMarto

A hearing on climate change and the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulation of green house gases promises to be a spectacle that could only be conceived in the 112th Congress. Republicans, anxious to continue what has become a frenzied campaign to deregulate decades worth of work, are poised to call on “expert witnesses,” prepared to say anything to revive a long ago decided debate on the need to regulate greenhouse gases.

According to The Hill, one witness Republicans will be calling upon tomorrow is  the director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama-Huntsville, John Christy, who in previous testimony on the issue of climate change told members of Congress,

We have found that climate models and popular surface temperature data sets overstate the changes in the real atmosphere and that actual changes are not alarming . . .

‘The names are familiar in climate policy circles. “Climate change deniers have a short bench, so we were not surprised at their witnesses,’ said a Democratic aide.”

If you are tired of seeing this same old fight, click here to step into the ring with Public Citizen and helps us in our efforts to redefine the energy debate and focus on a more sustainable future.

Tyson Slocum, the director of Public Citizen’s Energy Program, is featured today on the opinion page of AOL News. President Barack Obama is set to release his budget proposal next week, and when it comes to his energy allocations, we’re not expecting much. Tyson elaborates below:

If President Barack Obama’s budget proposal tracks the broad game plan for energy policy that he laid out in his State of the Union address, be prepared for a letdown when the numbers come out on Monday. For all of his “big ideas” — from Sputnik to job creation, high-speed rail to high-speed Internet — Obama offered underpowered solutions.

Continue Reading

Today’s Flickr photo:

Flickr photo by opacity

If you read one thing today…

A new year, a new position on global warming? Seems like Michigan’s Rep. Fred Upton, the incoming chairman of the House energy and commerce committee, seems to be whistling a different tune this year when it comes to climate change. Convenient, eh?

MoJo’s Kate Sheppard writes:

In the past, Upton has advocated taking action on global warming. “I strongly believe that everything must be on the table as we seek to reduce carbon emissions,” he once stated on his website. But that statement recently vanished from his site—along with, it seems, his concern about global warming. Following a tea party-aided Republican takeover of the House and a heated fight for the chairmanship of the powerful committee, Upton’s position on climate change has veered closer to those of his global-warming-denying caucus-mates. And he’s now vowing to use his new role to thwart efforts to cut emissions.

How do you think Upton’s prior record will affect the chances of acting on climate change in the new Congressional session?

Tyson Slocum, director of Public Citizen’s Energy Program, appeared on Fox Business News the other day to debate climate change. Did he win? You be the judge.

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.