a photograph of dollar bills

Flickr photo by borman818

Whatever you want to call it — “fiscal cliff,” “fiscal slope” or “fiscal obstacle course” — if Congress and President Barack Obama don’t act, automatic tax increases and spending cuts will begin to kick in on January 1, 2013. And if they permanently fail to act, the economy could be thrown back into recession.

The automatic, across-the-board “sequestration” cuts totaling $1.2 trillion over 10 years would be particularly devastating (PDF), affecting vital services, including education, food safety, disaster relief and law enforcement.

But we don’t have to go down that road. We don’t have to fall victim to lawmakers who are willing to impose crippling austerity measures on the nation.

One simple solution can significantly help fill the budget gap: a financial speculation tax.

The Wall Street Trading and Speculators Tax Act (S. 1787, H.R. 3313), introduced by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR), would impose a 0.03 percent fee (three pennies on $100) on the transfer of stocks, bonds and derivatives.

According to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation, this bill would generate more than $350 billion in revenues over the next ten years. Alone, that amount would fill 30 percent of the “sequestration” gap.

And that’s not all.

In addition to generating hundreds of billions of dollars to address our budget problems, a financial speculation tax would discourage dangerous high frequency trading (PDF) that causes flash crashes and losses in investor confidence, which damage our financial markets. And because the fee is so small, it would have virtually no impact on ordinary investors’ trading activities.

Sounds like a win-win to me.

Tell President Obama and your members of Congress to keep a financial speculation tax on the menu of options as the fiscal “fill in the blank” debate proceeds.

For more about Public Citizen’s efforts to stabilize our financial system, visit citizen.org/financial-stability.

Micah Hauptman is Public Citizen’s financial policy counsel. Follow him on Twitter at @Micah_Citizen.

Share/Bookmark

Comments

  • Bob Gustafson

    I am for making traders more responsible. Computer generated trading programs must be fool-proof. If they fail, the trading companies and the market they run in, must make the other side whole. If the trader is too small or goes bankrupt, the market must pick up the pieces.

    But, I don’t go for a transaction tax. Programmatic trading is a technological advance – it could be a big export industry for the USA. A transaction tax would kill it off.

Leave a Comment

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.