Archive for April 26th, 2011

A couple of lawyers passed quietly through Washington on Good Friday, a visit easily missed in a c"Bart Naylor" "Financial policy"ity overcharged with such professionals. The lawyers were in DC to lobby the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for relaxation of some of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act provisions affecting derivatives, also something all too common in this town where too often the story is about the financial services influence army.  Off the very public stage of Congressional hearings rages a very expensive underground war to prevent implementation of the Dodd-Frank law for which Public Citizen fought.

But Frank Iacono and Steve Plake don’t actually practice law, and they aren’t speaking on behalf of any of the major industry constituencies. They practice derivatives. Iacono helped develop the credit default swap. That’s the insurance-like product an investor can buy to hedge against the non-payment of amounts owed on bonds or loans.  (And you don’t even need to own the bond or loan—like buying fire insurance on your neighbor’s house. That’s one reason they’re called derivatives. They “derive” their value from something.)   Contact them at www.riversideadvisors.com if you’d like more details on how these things work.

Now, they’re attempting to clean up the derivatives market from within. Among their clients is a not-for-profit who attempted to lock in protection against rising interest rates on its borrowings with a fixed-floating swap, the most common derivatives product in the market. Unfortunately for this client, an intermediary fixed them up with Lehman Brothers as the swap provider, who defaulted on the contract and is now asking the client for a termination payment.  Riverside is assisting the not-for-profit, pro-bono, in its settlement negotiations with Lehman.  Exactly what the intermediary said about this swap is now part of the grievance.

And that’s only one of the interesting elements to their story. (We met at the Firehook Café, which isn’t actually a bar, but serves amazing lobster bisque on Fridays.)

  • These men think we could be in for another crash. Some of our biggest banks still suffer major financial cavities which under current disclosure standards cannot be detected from the financial reports. They need major surgery.
  • We need certification for derivatives advisors so they can promote better understanding by end-users and thin out the hucksters. Too many fly-by-night salesmen freight the portfolios of uninformed investors with high-risk derivatives.

Iacono, who hails from Long Island near his newly-formed boutique Riverside Risk Advisors in Manhattan, received his undergraduate degree from Yale before minting himself with a Harvard Law degree. As a third-year law school intern, he helped Orange County dig out of the mess left by investments with such exotic names as “inverse floaters” and “structured repos” – investments which were not fully understood by Treasurer Robert Citron and his staff.

Plake ventured from northern Indiana to Cornell, then Washington University Law School before trading derivatives in St Louis, and finally landing two months ago at Riverside.

Riverside describes itself as an “advisory boutique specializing in derivatives and structured financial products” which brings “transparency, better understanding of risks and improved pricing and transaction terms” to its clients. We disagree with at least some of what they say about pending regulatory proposals to rein in reckless derivatives trading. They’re in business and while their bottom line may include a better America, it also includes a richer Riverside Risk Advisors. Public Citizen is strictly non-profit.

But part of their marketing strategy consists of free training sessions on derivatives. That may seem more painful than a root canal, but it’s the kind of treatment more of us should undertake if we’re going to survive in this brave new world of complex finance. Good luck, fellas.

 

 

What do you do when the people you turn to when you’re sick, end up doing more harm than good? Millions of Americans suffer from a wide range of allergies. Imagine having an allergy to peanuts but not a label that explained what packaged food you were about to consume was processed in a plant where peanuts were processed. This was a scary reality years ago but we’ve made progress. However, when it comes to latex gloves we are far behind and today Public Citizen is petitioning the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a second time to get its act together before more lives are needlessly harmed or lost.

Imagine you were just in a car accident and were rushed to a hospital in an ambulance unconscious. You happen to have an allergy to latex but the attending physicians don’t know this and you are in no position to tell them.
In 1998, the German government banned the use of powdered latex gloves. According to Dr. Michael Carome, deputy director of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group,

“Collectively, thousands of lives have been saved and health spared in other countries because they have placed the health of the public ahead of the concerns of manufacturers of products with no unique benefits, only unique risks.”

The risks that are posed are posed to both the people administering care and receiving care.

For healthcare workers, the major risk posed by the gloves is allergic reactions to latex, some of which can be serious or life-threatening. These allergic reactions can occur when healthcare workers wear latex gloves or when they inhale cornstarch powder bound to latex proteins that has been released from latex gloves worn by others. Breathing in cornstarch powder bound to latex proteins can cause acute asthma attacks and anaphylactic shock in healthcare workers sensitized to latex.

For patients, the danger is also grave. Patients can experience the same types of allergic reactions that occur in healthcare workers. Also, when cornstarch is deposited in tissues during surgery, it can promote infections, delay healing and cause inflammation, among other injuries.

Surgical and patient examination gloves that have cornstarch powder on them or are made of natural rubber latex should be banned. When safer alternatives like powder-free, non-latex gloves, are readily available– it defies logic for the FDA to not catch up to speed on this issue.

View a copy of our petition to the FDA or read our press release for more quotes from Dr. Carome.

 

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.