Archive for April 1st, 2011

Stunning Statistics of the Week:

$750 million: The amount President Barack Obama raised and spent in the 2008 campaign
$1 billion: The estimated amount his campaign will cost in 2012

Source: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/26/how-much-does-it-cost-to-run-for-president/

Big bucks in the race for Oklahoma City Council
Oklahoma City Council members make just $12,000 a year, but apparently they are powerful enough to attract big bucks to their campaigns. Candidates and groups running independent campaigns to support candidates have raised $1.2 million and spent $1 million of that – an unprecedented amount, the Oklahoman reports. Two groups alone account for $545,000 of that. Although they are required to identify their donors, they merely list a nonprofit group as a donor, leaving the public in the dark as to who is really funneling money into the races.

Citizens United affects even local races, like this one in Alaska
An independent group is diving into the race for Anchorage’s Assembly, which is its city council. The new group, which is getting its money from developers and commercial real estate owners, is running ads designed to oust three progressive incumbents. Such independent spending would not have been possible for the U.S. Supreme Court’s January 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, an Alaska official told the Anchorage Daily News. That ruling gave corporations the green light to spend unlimited amounts of money to sway elections.

Tens of millions being raised for redistricting fights
Top Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives are raising millions of unregulated money from hidden sources for redistricting fights, Politico reports. The lawmakers could raise upwards of $30 million. The Federal Election Commission has given its blessing; it voted last year to allow lawmakers to raise money for an organization called the National Democratic Redistricting Trust. It is anticipated that much of the money will go toward legal costs.

Two former White House aides mull creation of independent political group
Remember how in 2008 candidate Barack Obama decried special interests raising money for independent campaign efforts? How times have changed. It appears as though two former White House aides are going to launch an independent political group to help Obama and combat the flood of independent group spending on the GOP side.

Continue Reading

Public Citizen is pleased to announce that we have accepted a generous grant  of $10 million dollars from BP.

In a just released statement, Public Citizen President Robert Weissman said:

We are extremely grateful to accept this check for $10 million dollars from our partners at BP. Though a little less than a year ago we launched a national boycott of BP, brought a giant inflatable oil barrel and

"Robert Weissman" "BP protest" "Public  Citizen BP"

Public Citizen mending fences with the enemy?

hundreds of protesters to their Washington, D.C. office, and have been relentlessly hounding them for years to clean up their act, we believe they are now good corporate citizens.

In addition, today, April 1, former BP CEO Tony Hayworth will join Public Citizen’s board of directors. Weissman went on to say,

Public Citizen is thrilled to have Tony join our board. We know that he will be warmly welcomed by our other Public Citizen board members.

By the way, did we mention … it’s APRIL FOOLS’ DAY!

Come on now, you know Public Citizen doesn’t accept corporate or government funding! We rely solely on donations from individuals, foundation grants and publication sales to keep us going. That enables us to remain fiercely independent.

We are YOUR lobbyists. For 40 years, we have been representing you in the halls of power, battling corporate interests and the attempted corporate takeover of government.

Take a moment to check out a few of our accomplishments. While you’re at it, feel free to support us so we can continue standing up to corporate power for another 40 years! Since it’s our 40th birthday this week, if you make a contribution of $40 or more, we will throw in a DVD of “The Story of Citizens United,” which exposes how the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission gave corporations the green light to take over our democracy by spending as much money as they want to influence elections.

Happy April 1!

You may not believe this email string with Geithner . . .

Following publication of “Hourly Rates: A Modest Essay on Extraordinary Paychecks,” the following email string appeared on my computer. As such, it reads from the bottom up.

From: bnaylor@citizen.org
To: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:52 PM
To: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

I’d need to check with my superiors. Will relay tomorrow.  Many thanks, again.

From: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:49 PM
To: bnaylor@citizen.org
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

Any names, in particular?

From: bnaylor@citizen.org
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:48 PM
To: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

LOL. With a stroke of your pen, you can name a pro-reform, enlightened leader to head the OCC. Need I detail our concerns with the national bank supervisor? You can name the person “acting.” No need to get them past Shelby. (We have other ideas on how to do that.)

From: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:35 PM
To: :bnaylor@citizen.org
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

Right. Let’s say your report rubbed me the right way. Tell me something I can do-accomplish-tonight?

From: bnaylor@citizen.org
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:30 PM
To: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

Three wishes, as in a genie in the bottle?  Solve moral hazard. Dodd-Frank takes important steps, but our large banks are even larger than before the crash. You can declare large banks systemically risky and order a breakup. Reform executive compensation to remove the incentive for risk-taking.  Wage an immediate public battle to fund fully the agencies and appoint a strong leader of the new Office of Financial Research.

From: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:24 PM
To: bnaylor@citizen.org
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

No time. I’m in the mood. You have three wishes.

From: bnaylor@citizen.org
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:18 PM
To: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

Public Citizen promotes a robust agenda. Given your position, perhaps there is a time when a delegation from Public Citizen along with our coalition umbrelled as Americans for Financial Reform could meet.

From: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:16 PM
To: bnaylor@citizen.org
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

You can cut the honorifics. So what are your policy ideas?

From: bnaylor@citizen.org
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:10 PM
To: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

Mr. Secretary
I am flattered you took the time to read the report.  Public Citizen’s Congress Watch published this as a vehicle to help me reach out to leaders on the important subject as we navigate policy.

From: Timothy.Geithner@do.treas.gov.
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20118:01 PM
To: bnaylor@citizen.org
Subject: FW: A Modest Essay about Extraordinary Paychecks

One of my aides forced me to read your report on high pay in the financial sector. I sense you don’t approve of a $5 billion annual salary. But you don’t actually say that. In fact,, you have no policy prescriptions at all.

Bartlett Naylor is financial policy advocate for Public Citizen, and former Chief of Investigations for the U.S. Senate Banking Committee.

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.