Archive for March 2nd, 2011

Talk about short-term memory.

For the first time since 2010’s oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, the Department of Interior has granted the first deepwater drilling permit for a well in which BP has the largest financial stake. To do so without imposing stronger environmental and safety standards is a recipe for disaster. The agency must be naïve to think this is about Noble Energy, the applicant.

The Interior Department must start evaluating financial partners in its assessment of whether to grant drilling permits and should not be granting application status to minority interest partners.

By considering this drilling permit a venture of Noble Energy, which has a 23.25 percent financial stake in the operation, the Interior Department has its head in the sand. BP, the corporation responsible for 4.9 million barrels of oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, has a financial interest double that of the application’s namesake. A 46.5 percent share is nothing to scoff at.

Although Noble’s name is on the application, BP could have twice the say on safety or environmental matters – and we’ve seen how that plays out.

If the Obama administration is really as serious as it claims about reforming the deepwater drilling industry, it must uphold the standards it has proposed. This is no time to be waiving the new stringent regulations, particularly when the involved corporation has a history of environmental and worker abuses.

The tougher permitting process has not led to the $100 barrels of oil we are seeing today. It is not the cause for panic at the pump.

Going forward, the Obama administration must subject deepwater well applications to tougher scrutiny and take into account all financial partners in an application. In the future, a minority partner cannot be allowed to be the applicant. The Obama administration should consider the track record and financial partners of applicants before approving a permit.

Note: take a moment to call upon Obama to reconsider.

Tyson Slocum is the director of Public Citizen’s energy program

In Citizens United v. FEC the U.S. Supreme Court expanded the scope of the case at hand and, in so doing, dismantled what weak and ineffective campaign spending constraints were already in place.  A report just issued by the Brennan Center for Social Justice yesterday examines the constitutionality of disclosure laws and the impact of the now infamous court ruling. Their report shows, “. . . an  ongoing need to promote transparency in the money in politics realm.”

Public Citizen could not agree more regarding the need for transparency.  A recent Hart poll shows that nearly four out of every five voters supports a constitutional amendment overturning the  Supreme Court’s ruling. We have joined forces with our board member Annie Leonard to educate others about the significance of the ruling and get involved in our campaign www.democracyisforpeople.org. Check out the video below and share it with friends.

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.