Archive for August 24th, 2010

While President Obama’s call to hold BP accountable for the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico was tough talk, the devil is in the details and in this case,  the details seem to be set up to limit BP’s liability in civil cases, while allowing the company plenty of wiggle room to avoid harsh penalties for its criminal behavior. Public Citizen President Robert Weissman and Tyson Slocum, director of our energy program, have an op-ed in Politico that urges President Obama to step up and fix the slew of  problems with BP’s $20 billion fund to compensate victims of the tragedy.

Weissman and Slocum write:

BP has sought to maintain control over the crisis response at every stage. Though it seems to have spared no expense congratulating itself with TV advertisements about its good efforts and deep concern for the Gulf ecosystem and the people who rely on it, BP has bungled just about everything it has touched here.

Things improved only when the government insisted that it supervise what’s going on.

Now BP aims to control the terms of payout and penalty. Like everything that came before, this is a public problem. It demands engagement by the administration.

There’s no easy way to clean up the Gulf. But it’s easy enough to clean up the trust agreement mess.

It’s time for the administration to act.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41411_Page2.html#ixzz0xYEbqyzY

Holman

In one of the most startling and biased jury surveys I have ever seen, the federal district court of D.C. is identifying “good government” people for possible disqualification from jury service in the Kevin Ring corruption scandal case.

Kevin Ring was an instrumental player on Team Abramoff, smack dab in the middle of the corruption conspiracy that so far has resulted in the conviction of one member of Congress and almost two dozen lobbyists and congressional staffers. Ring served as Rep. John Doolittle’s chief of staff — Doolittle was part of the “Ney, DeLay and Doolittle” congressional team that fought vociferously against limits on money in politics (all three have since been forced out of Congress because of corruption scandals) — before Ring moved on to the riches found in lobbying for Jack Abramoff. Ring appears to have

Continue Reading

A daily look at news from the Washington Post and New York Times that caught our eye:

How excited is big business about the upcoming elections? Well, consider that one political action committee that spent $2 billion on election advertising in 2008 (a presidential campaign year) is looking to double its investment during this year’s midterms. Peter Stone in Mother Jones gives us a look at what the Business Industry Political Action Committee is doing to gear up for the Congressional campaigns. The reason for their excitement is this year’s disastrous U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which cleared the way for unlimited corporate spending in our elections. Stone writes:

BIPAC president Greg Casey, though cautious about where and how the group might deploy these new tools, acknowledges that “the nature of the court ruling gives us a lot more places and activities for political communications than we had before.”

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.