Archive for June 24th, 2010

Holman

Today, the U.S. House of Representatives took the first bold step in repairing some of the damage caused by the U.S. Supreme Court’s disastrous decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Public Citizen applauds the passage of the DISCLOSE Act (H.R. 5175) by a 219 to 206 vote. Two Republican members of Congress – Reps. Michael Castle (Del.) and Walter Jones (N.C.) Anh “Joseph” Cao (La.) – stood firm on their principles of promoting transparency in elections and joined in leadership with Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) in pressing for adoption of the measure.

When five justices of the Supreme Court decided unilaterally to rewrite the nation’s campaign finance laws and allow unlimited corporate spending in elections, it became imperative for Congress, at least as a first step, to give voters a chance to know who is paying how much to promote or attack candidates. The DISCLOSE Act, which stands for Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light On Spending in Elections, provides voters the desperately needed means to decipher campaign messages by revealing the true funding sources behind campaign ads. The measure closes the gaping loopholes in current disclosure laws that allow corporations, unions and wealthy individuals to hide their campaign spending by funneling their money through trade associations and innocuous-sounding front groups. Revealing the funders behind these groups is perhaps the most valuable tool voters can use in evaluating the merits of the campaign messages that are about to besiege them.

Continue Reading

USA Today tries to make the case today against a boycott of BP and its various brands. They gave Public Citizen President Robert Weissman the opportunity to provide the opposing view. Weissman said BP finds itself in a predicament of its own making and must now face the consequences:

A boycott sends a message to BP that its shoddy oversight of this project and its history of environmental and worker safety violations are unforgivable.

Take the pledge to boycott BP at BeyondBP.org.

So, the long-awaited new guidelines from the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the group responsible for training doctors in the U.S., on medical resident work hours frankly weren’t worth the wait.

The group reformed very little about the length of shifts that medical residents pull (sometimes marathon shifts of 30 continuous hours, twice a week), really only shortening the shifts for residents in the ICU. Yes, those residents need to be alert, but so do doctors in all divisions.

The coalition WakeUpDoctor.org, which Public Citizen is a part of, issued a report card yesterday to see how the ACGME’s guidelines lined up to recommendations made by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2008. How did they do?

Continue Reading

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.