[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFugodtLH1A]
As we approach the 40th anniversary of the Clean Air Act, it is appropriate for the Environmental Protection Agency to use this law for the agency’s most important and challenging task yet: solving climate change. Decades of success using the act to make America’s communities cleaner and safer can serve as a model of how to tackle climate change.
Public Citizen supports the development of strong, science-based regulations to sharply reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, oil refineries and other “smokestack” emitters responsible for 70 percent of our nation’s emissions of pollutants that cause climate change. The EPA has emerged as the only arm of the federal government with the credibility to solve climate change, as Congress thus far has produced deeply flawed legislation that provides billions of dollars in financial giveaways to polluters while failing to fix our corporate-controlled energy system, which contributes to unsustainability and pollution.
Most unsettling is the fact that climate legislation passed by the House of Representatives would end the ability of the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. Public Citizen understands why polluters’ lobbyists have tried to eviscerate the EPA’s authority: Because they know that the agency now is largely shielded from the influence of corporate special interests and can therefore concentrate on formulating the regulatory solutions to climate change based on science, not politics.
As world leaders prepare to meet in Copenhagen next month to discuss how nations can work together to solve climate change, the eyes of the world will look not to Congress, but to the EPA for leadership. Public Citizen strongly supports the agency’s efforts to use the full extent of the Clean Air Act to implement science-based regulations to sharply reduce America’s greenhouse gas emissions from new and existing industrial sources.
Tyson Slocum is the director of Public Citizen’s Energy Program.












klaus radtke
I fully agree. We can only mitigate climate change through science-based regulations rather than politics-based regulations. We all must make sacrifices to achieve these goals.
Klaus Radtke
December 5, 2009 at 7:44 am
Ken Gale
An interesting approach, reminding the EPA that they’re losing their ability to do their jobs. Friend not foe. I hope they can do something on behalf of their own agency.
Tyson looks a bit like animator Bill Plympton.
December 5, 2009 at 12:37 pm
Dale
Get the EPA working on the national level . . . then all 49 states can be just like Kalifornistan.
Tyson . . . how does CO2 make the globe hot? I have been asking this question for over a decade, but no one seems to know. I remember my grade 9 biology . . . something about Photosynthesis and plants. Also CO2 . . . being 38 thousandths of the atmosphere seems like a rare gas, is not Water vapour over 96% of greenhouse gasses? Why don’t we regulate that???
One more question Tyson . . . what will we replace fossil fuels with . . . say next week or next year???
December 11, 2009 at 11:19 pm
Tyson Slocum
Hi Dale – this Scientific American post has tons of answers for you!
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=seven-answers-to-climate-contrarian-nonsense
December 16, 2009 at 12:56 pm