Archive for November 13th, 2009

sadsanta

No Christmas parties for Goldman Sachs this year according to this insightful piece by Jessica Toonkel Marquez in Investment News.

In an attempt to keep a low profile, The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has told its employees that it won’t be hosting a corporate Christmas party this year. The investment bank is also prohibiting employees from funding their own parties, an insider at the firm told InvestmentNews.

The Christmas party ban comes as Goldman has been under sharp public criticism for paying bigger bonuses this year while national unemployment hovers at 10.2% and many workers have taken pay cuts.

The take away? They have no shame about the radical redistribution of wealth from our economy into their own coffers ( from the article: “Last year, Goldman paid out $4.8 billion in bonuses, awarding 953 employees at least $1 million each and 78 employees at least $4 million. The rewards this year are expected to be greater.”). BUT they are increasingly sensitive to the fact that images of them flaunting this wealth make most Americans want to join an angry mob (including me … if you’re in D.C. on Monday at noon, come to the protest and rally at the Goldman Sachs headquarters on Capitol Hill).

Truly, appearances matter. But if Goldman Sachs was truly concerned

Continue Reading

(Cross-posted from Eyes on Trade)

If you opened the Washington Post this morning, you might have been surprised to find an opinion piece on the barriers that World Trade Organization (WTO) rules pose for climate solutions. More surprisingly, the authors were a rather odd couple – our own Lori Wallach (longtime fair trade reformer), and C. Fred Bergsten (longtime trade agreement promoter). Here’s a snippet:

There is a real danger that a collision between climate policy and trade agreements could derail two critical goals: controlling climate change and expanding trade.

But this danger is avoidable.

We are an unusual pair of advocates for this message. For a long time, we and our organizations have been on opposite ends of the debate over trade agreements, disagreeing about their effects on economies, livelihoods and domestic regulations.But we agree on a surprising number of aspects of the climate-change debate and on the related need to overhaul global trade negotiations, which are stalled by disagreements and the worldwide financial crisis.

They go on to warn that “Implementing a treaty on global warming could require

Continue Reading

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.